#Deluge vs qbittorrent utorrent
#Deluge vs qbittorrent software

#Deluge vs qbittorrent utorrent

If RAM is your biggest concern, utorrent is worse. Go with qBittorrent, Deluge, Transmission, etc. Torrents, you down load the torrent, you then have to trigger the torrent, that is pretty uncomplicated. I dont know where youre doing your research but utorrent is pretty well known to be one of the worst. If you're downloading it something illegitimate (*don't perform it*), in that case your ip could be tracked applying torrents and followed to you, and you will be presented liable (nevertheless, you may use peer guardian +/- proxy machines to bypass that, but there's nonetheless a risk)ĭirect downloads, it is the host that's in charge of what's posted, and that means you won't be in virtually any problem for downloading Torrents could be interrupted without fretting about wasting time, while immediate downloads require that you simply stay connected before entire file is usually completed Torrents' speed depends upon the quantity of seeders/leechers from the torrent (I've continually found primary download faster) Sounds like you want the pros and cons of torrent vs direct downloadsĭirect downloads contain a pretty reliable speed There are many torrent clients, but personally i consider utorrent lightweight while adequate enough for my needs.

#Deluge vs qbittorrent software

Namely you can continue incomplete files, yes but also with client mode you can monitor it continuously from your desktop but it also offers less software bloat over competition clients and runs easier on my cpu as well. So why do YOU guys use Deluge? Anything in particular you like about it compared to other clients?īecause it has many benefits over other clients. Call me lazy, but having to right click on a torrent and then left click on Open Folder requires much more work than double-clicking to open a torrent.

New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. As related to qBittorrent, for my specific needs, it was junk. I'm an average, run-of-the-mill user who just downloads and seeds. In the end, Deluge simply had the better functionality. But the missing features are just too essential for me to overlook.

I do like certain cosmetic things like it shows the tracker URL icons, and can set up/down speed limit for each torrent in the bottom menu instead of in columns. the recently used folder list is too cumbersome to use because it's hidden in submenus and requires too many mouse clicks cannot use a custom file extension for incomplete files cannot double-click on a torrent to open it. For the most part they're similar, but I did notice certain shortcomings. I decided to try Deluge to see what it's all about, since it's gained some popularity. When I do the same on qBittorrent, flatpak with default config, for the same torrent, to the same disk, I get 80 MBps (640 mbps) down (yes, I did quit Deluge, and made sure there's no local exchange via. I've been using qBittorrent for some time now, and love it. If I run latest Deluge on Fedora via flatpak with default config, I can get max of 30MBps (240 Mbps) on my favourite well-seeded Linux ISOs.